This case addresses the question of whether CEQA review can be avoided if project approval is accomplished via an initiative petition in combination with City Council approval, in the absence of an actual election. According the court: “It is settled that when a development project is approved by means of a ballot initiative placed on […]
CEQA, CEQA CaseIn this case the court held that the City of Monterey Park’s “Measure BB merely established a competitive bidding process for future waste services contracts; the new manner of awarding such contracts is a “fiscal activity” which does not involve a commitment to a specific project and therefore does not constitute a project subject to […]
CEQA, CEQA CaseIn this case the court ruled that the exhaustion-of-administrative-remedies requirement set forth in subdivision (a) of section 21177 applies to a public agency’s decision that a proposed project is categorically exempt from CEQA compliance as long as: (1) the public agency gives notice of the ground for its exemption determination, and (2) that determination is […]
CEQA, CEQA Case(2012) , Cal.App.4th [No. F063534. Fifth Dist. Apr. 26, 2012, Opinion Certified For Partial Publication] This case addresses what documents are properly parts of the administrative record in a CEQA case, and is useful for individuals preparing comments on environmental documents, CEQA consultants, Lead Agencies and litigators seeking to augment the administrative record in a […]
CEQA, CEQA Case(2012) , Cal.App.4th, [No. C067138. Third Dist. Mar. 29, 2012 as modified Apr. 26, 2012] In this case, Plaintiff Jamulians Against the Casino (JAC) contested the execution of an April 2009 settlement agreement between Caltrans (signed by Iwasaki) and the Jamul Indian Village. The purpose of the settlement agreement was to resolve federal litigation between […]
CEQA, CEQA Case